| Universal had a vastly different sound to Sugar Tax
and Liberator. Do you think the timing was just wrong for that album?
I dont know. I mean I spent the 3 years making Universal
wondering what it should sound like. Should I sound more acoustic?
because in the mid-90s there was such a backlash against 80s
electronic music and everybody seemed to be going more traditional
and, you know, every time I did something it was like 'Oh that sounds
too much like OMD'. I didnt know what to do. So I tried a
different direction and Im not sure why it wasnt successful.
I think, if Im to guess, it was a combination of the perception
of the band in the media as much as anywhere as being past its sell-by
date. No support from radio and therefore no support at retail from
some of the major stores.
I think if Walking On The Milky Way had been a top 3 hit you would have seen
the album sell very well. I mean Ive said before, if Oasis had released
Walking On The Milky Way, it would have sold all over the world. You cant
separate the actual music from the perceived credibility or perceived fashionability
and music goes in waves; what was recently in fashion, quickly becomes out of
fashion and I just think that OMD was out of fashion and nothing I could have
done - I could have gone techno, I could have gone hip hop - nothing I could have
done would have actually made Universal sell more.
Assuming Universal had sold really well, where do you
think OMD would be today?
I dont know. Probably still going unless the next album had died a horrible
death. I have to say that part of me is quite relieved not having to keep alive
this chain of history . Ive said it before, it was becoming a bit like an
albatross round my neck, OMD. It was like something thats been going that
long is just full of history and preconceptions and pressures. Im enjoying
not having to deal with that. And I also think that having a fresh canvas again
with writing for Atomic Kitten has really improved my songwriting. Ive found
a whole new way of doing things, listened to a whole new type of music. Whether
OMD fans like what I do now or not. I know some dont. The bottom line is
I am very pleased with the choice I made.
I was relieved in the end to release myself from what had become the burden
of being in OMD. I dont want it to sound like it was terrible and I hated
it, but it was just hard. The pressure of expectation and pressure of expectation
on me. I mean its all relative, but when youve been in a band that
was hugely successful, it hurts extra when you release records that arent
successful. If the Kittens had come out and failed, well there would have been
no precedent of success so it wouldnt have hurt so much if they hadnt
had any success. And there may well come a time with the Kittens if they release
records that arent successful and that will hurt then following on from
things that have been successful.
How would you feel about the OMD back catalogue being
remastered?
Id be delighted because particularly when it comes to CDs, the
technology for making CDs in the 80s compared to now is dreadful.
I would love to see them remastered. I know how much better the Singles album
and the B-Sides album sounded from being remastered from the original analogue
master tapes rather than the 80s digital masters. So yeah, I would love
to get new copies of the CDs remastered. But, you know, asking Virgin to
do it and Virgin actually doing it are 2 different things. Unless they think theres
an actual market they wont bother going to the expense.
What do you think about the idea of including extra
tracks on remastered albums?
For the avid collector I could understand why thats a bonus. But to
me thats just kind of messing around with the past. Ill make an analogy,
but its perhaps not to sound big-headed, but imagine if the Louvre decided
that to increase sales or to revamp its image, they were going to get the Mona
Lisa, clean it off again - as in remaster it - and to make it extra interesting
they were going to glue on a couple of Da Vinci sketches in the corners as well!
Not quite finished pictures, but just to spice it up a bit, make it more interesting!
(laughs) Because everyones seen the Mona Lisa once but you havent
seen it with the sketches stuck on!
I think Architecture And Morality has a great running order and is not going
to benefit from having a few extra tracks lobbed on the end and you could say
that for several of the albums I think. So, yes, do you like my analogy?! (laughs)
I mean, Ive got to be perfectly honest with you Paul, Im very
happy with the site because the site is what I want - the OMD archive. If it offends
people itll offend people but I just dont want to spend the rest of
my life reworking my history. Thats why I do Atomic Kitten, thats
why Im developing local bands. I want to - Ive said it a million times
- I want to go forward looking forward. I dont want to spend all of my time,
or even much of my time, looking backwards. It doesnt matter how happy you
are with the memory or fond of it and proud of what you did. Weve all got
things we want to keep doing in the future. Id rather spend the day writing
a new song for Atomic Kitten than spend the day wading through tracks and cutting
them and reorganising them and talking to Virgin about which pictures are going
on an OMD box set blah blah blah. The B-Sides thing was one thing, The Id thing,
you know, they are particular projects which I think have a reason, theyre
a couple of little untied little loose ends there that could be tied up. And also,
frankly, its a way of keeping people happy who are still interested in OMD
and also its a way that if we sell these things it helps make a bit of money
for the website so that the website effectively costs nothing to run. But thats
it. So if Virgin want to remaster things, great. If they want to make a box set,
great. But Id rather spend my time doing now stuff rather than old stuff.
If that offends people who think OMD are wonderful then Im sorry but I hope
that theyll understand.
Sure, but thats the questions they will ask
But it does seem to offend people though. I mean some people are well pissed
off that Im doing Atomic Kitten instead of making another OMD record but,
you know, tough.
Regarding the as-yet untitled unreleased material album,
can you describe your thoughts on the choice of tracks and maybe give a few descriptions
of whats actually going to be on there?
The bulk of it is from the very late 80s and first half of the 90s
because thats when I had demos of things on DATs that I still have
access to. Theres a few older and a few newer. Its a real mixture.
I mean theyre all basically mostly finished songs with vocals on. Theres
a couple of instrumentals but theyre just songs that for whatever reason
or another didnt seem to fit onto the body of work I was working on at the
time. And yet having said that, I actually think that the vast majority of them
are very interesting and pretty good pieces of music in their own right. And Im
sure people will listen to them and go "Oh, why wasnt that on Liberator?"
and "Why wasnt this on Sugar Tax?". So as you yourself have said about a
couple of the tracks that youve heard. I cant really describe it.
Theres Sister Maria Gabriel which is kind of like a 90s techno-pop
version of an OMD track. Theres a track called Jerusalem which is quite
abstract and experimental , but is actually like a techno track. Theres
a couple of late OMD songs like Never Let You Go which is the last track that
all 4 of the original band worked on. And its a finished song. Its
a totally finished song. Theres one line of lyrics I think which are sort
of scat vocal because I didnt actually have the words then.
Its quite broad actually. Theres quite a lot of stuff from Ireland
of things that were done during the Universal sessions which didnt get onto
the album. Interestingly enough, in the 80s because we were churning albums
out basically annually and we were touring for 4/5 or 6 months of the year, we
would write 10 songs and that was the album! (laughs) And usually we were scrabbling
for the last track in the studio and putting together a weird instrumental, abstract
thing. So, I seemed to have more to spare later on and that was partly to do with
I was trying out different directions and going Oh I dont think I should
do that and Oh I dont think I should do this, whereas in the 80s,
with that clarity and confidence we had, everything we did we thought was the
right style and we didnt have time to write 20 songs and pick 10, it was
like we wrote 10 and that was the album! (laughs)
|